

Suggested SEO title: IVCA Bharat DeepTech Report 2026: How India’s Deep Tech Crosses the Valley of Death
Meta description: India’s deep tech sector has attracted about $11.4 billion since 2015, with 2025 a record year. Here are the key findings from the IVCA Bharat DeepTech Report 2026 on funding, exits and the Valley of Death.
Target keywords: IVCA Bharat DeepTech Report 2026, India deep tech funding, valley of death deep tech, deep tech investment India, Series B funding gap, deep tech exits, secondary sales India, deep tech commercialisation India
TL;DR
The Valley of Death is the stage where a deep tech company has proven its technology but does not yet earn enough revenue to fund its own growth. Years of R&D, testing and certification have been spent, but production, customers and scale are still ahead, and the capital needed to cross this stretch is at its scarcest.
India’s deep tech companies can raise seed capital, but far fewer investors can write the larger Series B and C cheques that take technology from prototype to production. Many funds also have shorter lives than deep tech’s long development cycles require. Closing this gap will depend on patient, well-structured capital and stronger exit pathways. The report finds that secondary transactions are increasingly central to both.
The Bharat DeepTech Report 2026: From Lab to Leadership was released in August 2026 by the Indian Venture and Alternate Capital Association (IVCA). It combines IVCA–Venture Intelligence deal data from 2015 to 2026 year-to-date with responses from 100 funds covered by the IVCA DeepTech Fund Survey 2026.
The headline numbers show how quickly the sector has grown:
The report reads the concentration of funding since 2021 as a sign that the ecosystem is moving from early-stage proof points to commercial validation.
By sector. AI and generative AI lead in total funding at $2.8 billion, followed by EV and battery technologies. Semiconductors and spacetech are the fastest-growing segments, driven by national priorities and new policy frameworks.
By investor interest. Fund participation is highest in AI/generative AI and Enterprise DeepTech/SaaS, followed by spacetech and defence.
By geography. Bengaluru accounts for around half of all deep tech deals and funding. Alternate hubs are emerging in Ahmedabad, Kochi and Kolkata.
Every deep tech company follows a similar path. It starts with research, moves to a working prototype, and then must turn that prototype into a product customers will buy at scale. The gap between the second and third steps is known as the Valley of Death.
It is called a valley because the company’s needs rise just as its funding options fall. The technology works, so research grants and early-stage support fall away. But revenue is still small, so the company cannot yet fund manufacturing, certification and sales on its own. Many promising technologies never make it across.
Deep tech feels this more sharply than software, for three reasons:
| Stage | Where the Company Is | The Capital Challenge |
|---|---|---|
| Research | Proving the science | Grants and research funding |
| Prototype | Proving the technology works | Seed capital |
| The Valley of Death | Proving the business works | Large cheques, scarce investors |
| Scale | Growing revenue and production | Growth capital and exits |
The IVCA report shows exactly where this valley sits in India’s deep tech funding. Fund participation declines sharply beyond the seed stage, and very few funds can write larger cheques for growth-stage companies. Many funds also operate shorter fund lives than the sector requires, a mismatch with the time deep tech needs to develop and commercialise.
The gap also exists at the very beginning of the journey. Only 15% of surveyed funds back technologies at the lab and proof-of-concept stage (TRL 1–3).
| Stage | Capital Availability | What Companies Need |
|---|---|---|
| Lab and proof of concept (TRL 1–3) | Limited | Patient, research-oriented capital |
| Seed | Relatively strong | Validation and first customers |
| Series B/C (the Valley of Death) | Sharply lower | Large cheques for production and scale |
| Exit | Improving | Predictable liquidity pathways |
Exits are what return capital to investors, and the report finds this is where the ecosystem faces its biggest question and its most encouraging progress.
Exit visibility is the top challenge. 62% of funds identified exit visibility as their primary challenge. Long gestation periods ranked second.
Exit activity rose sharply in 2025. There were 18 exits worth $600 million in 2025, compared with just 7 exits worth $152 million in 2024.
Secondary sales are the leading exit route. Secondary transactions accounted for 56% of all exits, while the IPO route remains viable but requires a deeper layer of growth-stage capital. Secondary sales also delivered the strongest average returns over the 10-year period, which the report sees as a sign of potential for capital recycling.
| Exit Route | Role in Indian Deep Tech |
|---|---|
| Secondary sales | Most common route, with the strongest average returns over the decade |
| Strategic M&A | Preferred route for many investors |
| IPO | Viable, but depends on deeper growth-stage capital |
Deep tech limited partners (LPs) in India are largely domestic, spanning family offices, domestic institutions and high-net-worth investors. Participation from global and corporate LPs is growing steadily.
Government capital is also available through instruments such as the RDI Scheme, the SIDBI Startup India Fund of Funds 2.0 and the India Semiconductor Mission. However, 40% of surveyed funds have yet to engage with any government capital vehicle. Survey participants also called for dedicated tax incentives and public procurement reform.
Deep tech needs patient, structured capital. Development cycles are long, so fund life and investment horizon should match the technology’s path to commercialisation.
Crossing the Valley of Death is where value is created. Companies that have made it across, with technology validated, paying customers secured and production underway, have cleared deep tech’s hardest stage. The risk of failure falls sharply, while much of the growth is still ahead.
Secondaries are becoming central to liquidity. With secondaries accounting for most deep tech exits and delivering strong average returns, structured secondary transactions are an increasingly important way for investors to realise value before an IPO.
Exit planning matters from day one. Because exit visibility is the sector’s biggest challenge, investors should evaluate liquidity pathways at the point of investment, not only at the end.
Diversification manages long timelines. Spreading exposure across companies, sectors and stages reduces dependence on any single technology reaching commercial scale.
| Evaluation Dimension | Before the Valley of Death | After the Valley of Death |
|---|---|---|
| Technology Status | Being proven | Validated in real-world use |
| Capital Availability | Relatively strong at seed | Selective, but backing proven businesses |
| Key Risk | Technical and commercial | Execution and scaling |
| Time to Exit | Long | Shorter, with scale still ahead |
| Liquidity Route | Distant | Secondaries, M&A or IPO |
“In deep tech, the science proves what is possible; crossing the Valley of Death decides what reaches scale.”
TERMS OF USE
Thank you for your interest in our Website at https://unlistedintel.com/. Your use of this Website, including the content, materials and information available on or through this Website (together, the “Materials”), is governed by these Terms of Use (these “Terms”). By using this Website, you acknowledge that you have read and agree to these Terms.
NO OFFER, SOLICITATION OR ADVICE
Our site is provided for informational purposes only. It does not constitute to constitute (i) an offer, or solicitation of an offer, to
purchase or sell any security, other assets, or service, (ii) investment, legal, business, or tax advice, or an offer to provide such advice or (iii) a basis for making any investment decision.
The Materials are provided for informational purposes and have been prepared by Oister Global for informational purposes to acquaint existing and prospective underlying funds, entrepreneurs, and other company founders with Oister Global's recent and historical investment activities.
Please note that any investments or portfolio companies referenced in the Materials are illustrative and do not reflect the performance of any Oister Global fund as a whole. There is no obligation for Oister Global to update or alter any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.
PURPOSE LIMITATION AND ACCESS TO YOUR PERSONAL DATA:
We will only collect your personal data in a fair, lawful, and transparent manner. We will keep your personal data accurate and up to date. We will process your personal data in line with your legal rights. We use your name and contact details, such as email, postal address, and contact number to continue communications with you. We may also use your contact information to invite you to events we are hosting or to keep you updated with our news.
USE OF COOKIES OR SIMILAR DEVICES
We use cookies on our website. This helps us to provide you with a better experience when you browse our website and also allows us to make improvements to our site. You may be able to change the preferences on your browser or device to prevent or limit your device’s acceptance of cookies, but this may prevent you from taking advantage of some of our features.
MATERIAL
The material displayed on our site is provided “as is”, without any guarantees, conditions, or warranties as to its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. You should be aware that a significant portion of the Materials includes or consists of information that has been provided by third parties and has not been validated or verified by us. In connection with our investment activities, we often become subject to a variety of confidentiality obligations to funds, investors, portfolio companies, and other third parties. Any statements we make may be affected by those confidentiality obligations, with the result that we may be prohibited from making full disclosures.
MISCELLANEOUS
This Website is operated and controlled by Oister Global in India. We may change the content on our site at any time. If the need arises, we may suspend access to our site, or close it indefinitely. We are under no obligation to update any material on our site.
CONTACT INFORMATION
Any questions, concerns or complaints regarding these Terms should be sent to info@oisterglobal.com