Pic of Shivanshi
Shivanshi Chugh
Senior Manager, Brand & Investor Relations
800+ investors started
with a call.
Sector Focus

The Franchise Flywheel: Why Owning the IP Matters More Than Making the Product

November 14, 2026

TL;DR

  • The most valuable asset in entertainment is not a hit film. It is the intellectual property (IP) that keeps producing hits for decades.
  • This is the franchise flywheel: once IP is proven, each new format, sequel and market adds value to everything that came before.
  • The biggest franchise returns were captured in private deals, long before the public saw the box-office payoff.
  • Mirzapur shows the same pattern in India. IP proven on streaming moved to the big screen, and a global strategic investor priced the studio behind it months before the film opened.
  • For private market investors, the lesson is to back owners of proven, defensible IP at the point where it is about to scale into new formats and markets, and to spread that exposure across a portfolio rather than betting on a single title.

Quick Answer

The franchise flywheel is the compounding effect that proprietary IP creates once it has been validated. Every sequel, spin-off, new format and new market reuses the same underlying asset, so each new product costs less to launch and earns more than a new, unproven one.

The investors who capture most of that value are usually not the ones buying a ticket, or a listed share, after the hit. They are the ones who secured ownership of the IP privately, while its future formats and markets were still ahead of it.

What Is the Franchise Flywheel?

This year, Spider-Man: Brand New Day overtook Star Wars: The Force Awakens to become the highest-grossing film ever in the United States and Canada. In India, it is the second-biggest film of 2026, with ₹597.77 crore in domestic gross.

On the surface, this looks like a story about one successful film. It is really a story about a character created in 1962 that has now been monetised across three trilogies, animated films, crossovers, merchandise and streaming.

That is the franchise flywheel. The film is the product. The IP is the asset. Products peak and fade; well-managed IP keeps compounding.

The Deal That Built the Flywheel Was Private

The public sees the box office. The value was created years earlier, in private negotiations.

Sony and Spider-Man. In 1999, Sony Pictures bought the rights to Spider-Man’s film and TV appearances for a reported $7 million, a deal later seen as one of the most consequential licensing agreements in entertainment history. Marvel had filed for bankruptcy only three years earlier. Sony’s Spider-Man films have since grossed more than $8.9 billion at the box office.

The deal Sony turned down. Sony reportedly had the chance to own the film rights to nearly every other Marvel character, excluding the X-Men and Fantastic Four, for $25 million, and declined. Sony was right to back Spider-Man, but it made a single-title bet and missed the wider library.

Disney and Marvel. In 2009, Disney paid about $4 billion for Marvel Entertainment and its portfolio of more than 5,000 characters. By early 2023, the Marvel Cinematic Universe had earned $28.2 billion at the global box office.

In each case, the investor that captured the value did not wait for the hit. It secured ownership of the IP privately, when the next formats and markets were still ahead.

Mirzapur: India’s Franchise Flywheel in Action

India now has its own version of this story.

Mirzapur began as an Amazon Prime Video series in November 2018, produced by Excel Entertainment. Over three seasons, it built one of the most loyal audiences in Indian streaming. On September 4, 2026, the franchise made the jump to cinemas with Mirzapur: The Movie. The film was made on an estimated budget of ₹80–90 crore and grossed ₹295.05 crore, becoming the fourth highest-grossing Hindi film of 2026.

The IP moved to a new format. A franchise proven in one format, streaming, was taken into another, theatres. That is the flywheel at work: an audience built over years became the opening-weekend crowd. The film needed around ₹115 crore to be considered a clean hit, and it comfortably beat that.

The private market priced the IP before the public payoff. In January 2026, eight months before the film released, Universal Music Group’s India arm agreed to buy a 30% stake in Excel Entertainment at a valuation of ₹2,400 crore. The deal also gave UMG global distribution rights for all future original soundtracks from Excel’s projects. A global strategic investor committed capital to the IP owner while the next format was still to come, exactly as Sony and Disney did.

Why Owning the IP Beats Making the Product

The difference between a product-maker and an IP owner is the difference between one-time revenue and compounding value.

Product-MakerIP Owner
Each launch starts from zeroEach launch builds on an existing audience
Revenue ends when the product fadesRevenue compounds across sequels, formats and markets
Value depends on the next hitValue depends on the durability of the asset
Competes on executionCompetes on ownership

This logic is not limited to cinema. A drone company with proprietary technology, a consumer brand with a loyal customer base, and a storytelling platform with a library of regional-language content are all IP businesses. Their value comes from owning something others cannot easily replicate, and from reusing it across new products and markets.

The Private Markets Lesson

The franchise flywheel offers four lessons for investors in private markets.

Value is created before it is visible. By the time a hit is in cinemas, or a company is listed, much of the IP’s value is already reflected in the price. The largest returns went to those who owned the asset privately, before the public payoff.

The best entry point is validated IP at an inflection point. Sony did not buy an idea; it bought a character with decades of proven appeal. UMG did not back an untested studio; it backed a company whose IP had already built an audience. The strongest private market opportunities sit at the same point: the asset is proven, and the next stage of scale is still ahead.

Single-title bets concentrate risk. Sony’s Spider-Man bet worked, but Sony missed an entire library for $25 million. Franchises can also fatigue. Spider-Man 3 showed early signs of franchise fatigue, and the 2014 reboot sequel underwhelmed audiences and critics. A diversified portfolio of IP owners captures the flywheel without depending on any single title.

Underwriting matters more than hype. Not every popular IP compounds. What separates durable franchises from one-off hits is the quality of the asset, the strength of its owner, and whether it can travel across formats and markets. Those are the questions a disciplined private market investor asks before committing capital.

Structural Comparison: Buying the Hit vs. Owning the IP

Evaluation DimensionBuying the HitOwning the IP Early
Entry TimingAfter success is visibleBefore the next format or market
Entry PricingReflects public enthusiasmReflects private underwriting
Source of ReturnOne product’s performanceCompounding across products and markets
Risk ProfileTied to a single titleSpread across a library or portfolio
Investor AdvantageAccessOwnership and structure

“In entertainment and in private markets, the audience pays for the product; the investor profits from the IP.”

Q: What is the franchise flywheel?
A: It is the compounding effect of proven intellectual property. Each sequel, format or market builds on an existing audience, so the IP grows more valuable with every new product.
Q: Why does owning IP matter more than producing a single hit?
A: A single hit generates revenue once. Owned IP can be monetised repeatedly over decades through sequels, spin-offs, merchandise, streaming and new markets.
Q: How does Mirzapur illustrate this?
A: Mirzapur built its audience as a streaming series from 2018, then moved successfully to cinemas in 2026. A global strategic investor valued its producer, Excel Entertainment, at ₹2,400 crore in a private deal months before the film released.
Q: What does this mean for private market investors?
A: The strongest returns often come from owning proven IP privately at an inflection point, before its next stage of scale becomes visible to the public. Spreading that exposure across a diversified portfolio reduces dependence on any single title.
Q: Does this apply beyond entertainment?
A: Yes. Any business built on proprietary, defensible IP, whether in technology, consumer brands or content, benefits from the same flywheel when it can reuse that IP across new products and markets.
  1. Wikipedia, 2026 US box office list (compiled from Box Office Mojo), en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_2026_box_office_number-one_films_in_the_United_States
  2. Wikipedia, 2026 India box office list, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_2026_box_office_number-one_films_in_India
  3. Workweek, June 2022, workweek.com/2022/06/11/how-marvel-lost-spider-man
  4. Ghostmail blog, March 2026, ghostmail.co.za
  5. Looper, looper.com/1548929/sony-spider-man-movies-revenue-marvel
  6. Workweek, June 2022 (citing the Wall Street Journal)
  7. TechCrunch, Aug 31, 2009, techcrunch.com
  8. Boxoffice Pro, Feb 2023, boxofficepro.com
  9. Wikipedia, Mirzapur (TV series), en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mirzapur_(TV_series)
  10. Wikipedia, Mirzapur (film), en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mirzapur_(film)
  11. Siasat, Sept 2026, siasat.com
  12. Bollywood Hungama, bollywoodhungama.com/movie/mirzapur-the-movie/box-office
  13. Music Business Worldwide, Jan 2026, musicbusinessworldwide.com
  14. Ghostmail blog, March 2026
Pic of Shivanshi
Shivanshi Chugh
Senior Manager, Brand & Investor Relations
800+ investors started
with a call.

TERMS OF USE

Thank you for your interest in our Website at https://unlistedintel.com/. Your use of this Website, including the content, materials and information available on or through this Website (together, the “Materials”), is governed by these Terms of Use (these “Terms”). By using this Website, you acknowledge that you have read and agree to these Terms.

NO OFFER, SOLICITATION OR ADVICE

Our site is provided for informational purposes only. It does not constitute to constitute (i) an offer, or solicitation of an offer, to

purchase or sell any security, other assets, or service, (ii) investment, legal, business, or tax advice, or an offer to provide such advice or (iii) a basis for making any investment decision.

The Materials are provided for informational purposes and have been prepared by Oister Global for informational purposes to acquaint existing and prospective underlying funds, entrepreneurs, and other company founders with Oister Global's recent and historical investment activities.

Please note that any investments or portfolio companies referenced in the Materials are illustrative and do not reflect the performance of any Oister Global fund as a whole. There is no obligation for Oister Global to update or alter any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.

PURPOSE LIMITATION AND ACCESS TO YOUR PERSONAL DATA:

We will only collect your personal data in a fair, lawful, and transparent manner. We will keep your personal data accurate and up to date. We will process your personal data in line with your legal rights. We use your name and contact details, such as email, postal address, and contact number to continue communications with you. We may also use your contact information to invite you to events we are hosting or to keep you updated with our news.

USE OF COOKIES OR SIMILAR DEVICES

We use cookies on our website. This helps us to provide you with a better experience when you browse our website and also allows us to make improvements to our site. You may be able to change the preferences on your browser or device to prevent or limit your device’s acceptance of cookies, but this may prevent you from taking advantage of some of our features.

MATERIAL

The material displayed on our site is provided “as is”, without any guarantees, conditions, or warranties as to its accuracy, completeness, or reliability. You should be aware that a significant portion of the Materials includes or consists of information that has been provided by third parties and has not been validated or verified by us. In connection with our investment activities, we often become subject to a variety of confidentiality obligations to funds, investors, portfolio companies, and other third parties. Any statements we make may be affected by those confidentiality obligations, with the result that we may be prohibited from making full disclosures.

MISCELLANEOUS

This Website is operated and controlled by Oister Global in India. We may change the content on our site at any time. If the need arises, we may suspend access to our site, or close it indefinitely. We are under no obligation to update any material on our site.

CONTACT INFORMATION

Any questions, concerns or complaints regarding these Terms should be sent to info@oisterglobal.com